Commonwealth v. Richman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen :
Although I concur in the result reached by Mr. Justice Nix, I totally disagree with his analysis of Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682, 92 S. Ct. 1877 (1972).
Mr. Justice Nix makes the bold assertion: “Kirby does not establish an all inclusive rule; rather, the line to be drawn depends upon the procedure employed by each state. We are therefore faced with the issue of whether this lineup preceded the ‘initiation of adversary judicial proceedings’ as defined in Pennsylvania. While the plurality in Kirby attaches some significance to the indictment, they…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.