Legal Opinion

Petsch v. Jackson Cnty. Prosecuting Attorneys Office

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2018No. WD 81536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLisa White Hardwick, Judge

Ruth Petsch, the District Defender of the Area 16 Public Defender Office, and the Area 16 Public Defender Office (collectively, "the District Defender") filed an application for review of the Presiding Judge's order denying her request for relief for caseload issues concerning two public defenders. On appeal, the District Defender contends the Presiding Judge erred by refusing to hold a hearing on the record; denying her request for relief in the form of wait lists and the appointment of private counsel; concluding that caseload issues did not render the two public defenders unable to provide…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oyler v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Glover v. Saint Louis County Circuit CourtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Dennis v. Riezman Berger, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re: Area 16 Public Defender Office III Ruth Petsch v. Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney's OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. In Re: Area 5 Public Defender Office v. The Honorable Daniel F. Kellogg, Presiding Judge of the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API