Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Handley

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 29, 1894No. 206PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. . The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

Ruth A. Newsom, née Ilandley, Benjamin T. Ilandley, Harvey L. Ilandley, and Sarah A. Chapman filed their petition in the probate court of Salt Lake County, Utah Territory, in the matter of the estate of George Ilandley, deceased, setting forth the death of said George Handle)7, May 25,. 1874, intestate; the appointment and qualification of Elizabeth, his widow, as administratrix of his estate, April 12, 1888: the expiration of the time for the presentation of claims after publication of notice; the filing of the inventory of said estate describing certain real pi’opertv; the sale of a portion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Carbondale Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. New Orleans Pacific Railway Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Miller v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Putney v. WhitmireU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1895
  3. Wilson v. KieselSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Wees v. ElbonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Toledo, St. L. & W. R. Co. v. ReardonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API