Guerra v. State

PBENDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of seduction and assessed the lowest punishment.

The sole question in the case is whether the court should have granted him a new trial because after the trial, in a motion for new trial one of the jurors was alleged to be under twenty-one years of age.

The record shows that the court heard evidence on this question in passing upon the motion for new trial. There is at the end of the statement of facts herein on the trial of the case what purports to be the testimony heard by the court on this motion. It was filed, not in term time, but weeks…