Daniel Forbes Co. v. Leonard
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action of assumpit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Geobge W. Beown, Judge, presiding. Statement by the Court. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court in favor of appellees against appellant for $1,368. The cause was tried by the court below without a jury by agreement of the parties.
Read the full summary
Action of assumpit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Geobge W. Beown, Judge, presiding. Statement by the Court. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court in favor of appellees against appellant for $1,368. The cause was tried by the court below without a jury by agreement of the parties. The issues were found for the plaintiffs and their damages assessed at $1,368. A motion for a new trial was made by the defendant (appellant here) and overruled by the court. Exceptions were duly preserved to such rulings and to the entry of judgment, and the cause brought…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
delivered the opinion of the court.-.
There was reserved until the hearing of this appeal a motion by the appellees to strike from the transcript of record filed herein the documents purporting to he the Bill of Particulars and the Supplemental Bill of Particulars, on the ground that while the same appear in the common-law record, they are not incorporated in the bill of exceptions. It is true, as suggested by the appellees in support of said motion, that a bill of particulars must be shown by a bill of exceptions if it is to be considered by a reviewing court (Hess v. Dawson, 51 Ill. App.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lœwenthal v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- George H. Hess Co. v. DawsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thede v. KapsasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Thede v. KapsasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008