Unite Here Retirement Fund v. City Of San Jose
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 UNITE HERE RETIREMENT FUND, et Case No. 5:20-cv-06069-EJD al., 9 ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 v. 11 Re: ECF Nos. 95, 97, 100 CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on a dispute regarding a withdrawal liability imposed 15 by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), as amended by the Multiemployer 16 Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”). The MPPAA requires an employer 17 withdrawing from a multiemployer pension…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Provenz v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Torres v. City of MaderaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.