Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Lakin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

The appellant’s automobile and that of Joseph M. Lyons collided, and Helen Lakin, the appellee, was injured, and ■brought an action against both owners, and recovered ag’ainst Joseph H. Lyons by default and against the appellant after trial. At the close of appellee’s case, the appellant offered two prayers, and, on their rejection, submitted no testimony. The first prayer was a demurrer to the legal sufficiency of the proof on the part of the appellee, and the second prayer sought to withdraw the ease from the jury by an instruction asserting that the appellee was precluded from recovering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Huber Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  2. Lewis v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  3. Fitzjarrell v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  4. Lavine v. AbramsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. Carter v. PhillingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Warner v. MarkoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. Gordon v. OpaleckyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. M. A. Long Co. v. State Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Dashiell v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. MerrikenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API