Legal Opinion · Dissent

Journal-Gazette Co. v. Bandido's, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1999No. 57S03-9709-CV-495Published

1DissentDickson, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion as to its disapproval of Indiana’s traditional common law standard, the failure to use reasonable care (often referred to as “negligence”), in private defamation cases against media defendants. The majority instead chooses the actual malice standard, which federal constitutional jurisprudence mandates only in certain other specified circumstances.

A. Limitations Imposed by Federal Jurisprudence ■

Defamation actions, when brought against media defendants, are subject to limitations imposed by the First Amendment1 to the Constitution of the United…

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API