Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Knopp

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1996No. D020302PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PATE, J.*

In this appeal from a declaratory judgment in favor of plaintiff Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers) we must determine whether the personal automobile liability policy issued by Farmers to defendant Michael Herrin (Herrin), a named insured, provides coverage for an automobile accident that occurred when Herrin was driving his employer’s automobile. Herrin was employed as a driver for a “limousine” service for hire by *1418members of the general public. At the time of the accident, he had dropped off his passenger and was returning to his employer’s place of business. We conclude…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
  5. Cooper Companies, Inc. v. Transcontinental InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mez Industries, Inc. v. Pacific National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Meridian Leasing, Inc. v. Associated Aviation Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Logisticare Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. TIG Ins. Co. of Michigan v. Homestore, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API