Legal Opinion

Steenstrup v. Morton

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 4, 1929No. 2112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding awarding priority of invention to appellee Morton. The issue is in two counts, as follows:

“1. In an are welding apparatus wherein a, welding head is arranged to move with relation to the work to be welded and wherein means are arranged to feed a fusible electrode through said head toward the work automatically at a rate depending upon a function of the energy at the are, the combination with said welding head of means for guiding the arc along the surfaces to be welded and for adjusting…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brand v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  2. McKee v. NoonanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  3. Bendix Aviation Corp. v. OomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API