Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. Farr

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 15, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01119Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONTREAL D. HEMPHILL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01119-AWI-EPG 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER REQUIRING 13 PLAINTIFF TO: 14 (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 15 v. 16 (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO PROCEED ONLY ON THE 17 CLAIMS FOR UNLAWFUL ARREST AND EXCESSIVE FORCE IN VIOLATION OF 18 THE FOURTH AMENDMENT; OR JONATHAN FARR AND CHAD 19 MEDEIROS (3) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE 20 Defendants. WISHES TO STAND ON THE COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO THE COURT 21 ISSUING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE 22 DISTRICT JUDGE…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Philomene Long, Surviving Spouse and Heir-At-Law of John Thomas Idlet, Deceased v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API