Alexander v. Hagedorn
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Smedley
I find it impossible to agree to the opinion of the majority and the judgment reversing and rendering the judgments of the Court of Civil Appeals and the District Court, because that opinion and the resulting judgment treat the applicable equitable rules as inflexible rules, ignoring the fact that the rules of equity are in a measure flexible and adaptable to particular exigencies. In doing so the Court is permitting one party in this case to suffer gross wrong at the hands of the other party, and is denying to this Court, although it is a court of equity and this is an equitable proceeding,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kelley v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Crouch v. Panama Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Greathouse v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.