IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF DUKE
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.
¶ 1 The principle question before this Court is whether Petitioner, Brian E. Duke, has presented clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the competency and learning in the law necessary to be reinstated to the roll of attorneys and membership in the Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA). This Court approved Petitioner’s application for resignation from the OBA sixteen (16) years ago, pending disciplinary proceedings. After a de novo review of the record, this Court holds Petitioner did not demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the requisite competency and learning in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Reinstatement of MunsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- In Re the Reinstatement of FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- In Re the Reinstatement of BlevinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- In Re the Reinstatement of TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- In re the Reinstatement of BodnarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF RICKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF RICKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF GIERHARTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF BRIAN KEITH MELTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2026
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF GIERHARTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.