Legal Opinion

State v. Farrell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 10, 1965No. 1 CA-CR 6PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

The defendant was tried by a jury and found guilty of the illegal possession of certain narcotics, to wit: Dilaudid and Papaverine. A motion for a new trial was made and overruled. The defendant was adjudged guilty and sentenced. This appeal followed. The trial judge is a man of extensive experience as a lawyer and many years of experience as an able trial judge before his retirement. At the trial the defendant was represented by a court appointed attorney who has tried numerous cases and who represents his clients well. This appeal is prosecuted by another attorney who…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. VillavicencioArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. OwenArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. VallejosArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Turley v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CousinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. State v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. KountzArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. McFallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. State v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API