Legal Opinion
the Cadle Company v. Regency Homes, Inc. and Gene Rutland
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided March 30, 2000No. 03-99-00318-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-99-00318-CV
The Cadle Company, Appellant
v.
Regency Homes, Inc. and Gene Rutland, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 149,538-B, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING
Appellant, The Cadle Company (Cadle), brought suit against appellees, Regency Homes, Inc. (Regency) and Gene Rutland, (1) guarantor, for payment of three promissory notes. The case was tried to the bench. Finding that the notes had been paid and that Cadle did not own the guaranty, the trial court ordered that Cadle take nothing against…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Westech Engineering, Inc. v. Clearwater Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.