Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1966No. 42379PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

“ (a) When a search warrant and the affidavit upon which it is issued do not recite sufficient facts upon which a determination of probable cause could be made by the issuing magistrate, the burden is on the State to show that sufficient facts were submitted before the magistrate to establish the existence of probable cause, (b) To support a finding of probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant, there must be presented by oath or affirmation to the issuing magistrate some of the underlying circumstances causing the officer applying for the warrant to believe…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Yancy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Mickle v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. McKibben v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Byrd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  4. Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API