Moore v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellant Michael Moore (Moore) appeals from his convictions of dealing in cocaine 1 and reckless possession of paraphernalia 2 .
We affirm.
ISSUES
Moore presents two issues for our review which we re-state as follows:
1. Whether the trial court properly denied Moore’s motion to suppress evidence obtained in a warrantless search of the automobile in which Moore was a passenger.
2. Whether the evidence is sufficient to support Moore’s convictions.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On or about April 10, 1993, Police Officer Red Elk stopped the vehicle in which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fair v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Corrao v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Rabadi v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Stephens v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Goodner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- McClendon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- S.A. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.