Legal Opinion
Sobh v. Phoenix Graphix Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 12, 2022No. 2:19-cv-05277Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Sam Sobh, No. CV-19-05277-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Phoenix Graphix Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Sam Sobh filed this suit claiming he was seeking a “hardship distribution” 16 from the pension plan he participated in while employed by Defendant Phoenix Graphix 17 Inc. The Court previously concluded Sobh was “not eligible for a hardship distribution” 18 under the terms of the pension plan. (Doc. 40 at 13). Despite losing his claim regarding a 19 hardship distribution, Sobh…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Alexandria Gregg v. Hawaii Dept. of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Emma Anderson v. Flexel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Charles Wetzel v. Lou Ehlers Cadillac Group Long Term Disability Insurance Program Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Gabriel v. Alaska Electrical Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.