Legal Opinion

DeAngelis v. Laughlin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1969No. Appeal, 108PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is quashed because: (1) illegality of a contract (though a difficult issue here) is an affirmative defense which shall be pleaded by way of New Matter, 12 P.S. App., B.C.P. 1030 (1967), and cannot be raised by way of preliminary objections, Goodrich-Am-ram, Standard Pennsylvania Practice, §1017 (b)-2 at 69, and §1030-1.2 at 193, and (2) because an order overruling appellant’s preliminary objections is interlocutory and not appealable, Grosso v. Englert, 381 Pa. 351, 113 A. 2d 250 (1955). The Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 P.S. §672, does not confer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grosso v. EnglertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Guzek v. Empire Wholesale Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allegheny Contracting Industries, Inc. v. FlahertyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Maybee v. McKnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Barbet v. EdelsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Givens v. GivensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Givens v. GivensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API