Legal Opinion
Lantier v. Guy Scroggins, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1969No. 2669PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Judge.
Plaintiff, Oscar Lantier, claims workmen’s compensation benefits based on allegations that he is totally and permanently disabled. The defendants are Guy Scrog-gins, Inc., and its insurer, Continental National American Group. The trial judge concluded that plaintiff is not disabled from performing the duties of his employment, but that he did sustain the loss of a physical function, and that he thus is entitled to benefits under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 23:1221(4) (p).
Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, awarding him compensation at the rate of $35.00 per week for 100…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- Gulf MacHine Shop v. PoynterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Moreau v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Clevinger v. Continental Insurance CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Miers v. Truck Insurance ExchangeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pender v. National Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Jackson v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Carter v. Roy O. Martin Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Chapman v. Travelers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Johnson v. Guastella Construction & Realty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.