Legal Opinion

People v. Estrada

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Burice, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen. Chief Judge Fuld dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the order of Criminal Term granting defendant’s motion to suppress on the ground that a person charged with possession of contraband at the time of an unlawful search and seizure is necessarily a ‘ ‘ person * * * aggrieved” (Code Crim. Pro., § 813-c) by such illegal conduct even though he may not have had physical custody of the property. (See Jones v. United States, 362 U. S. 257, 263-264.)

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. L.J.M. Venture No. 1 v. JoyNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. PlevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Tejada v. ChristianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979