Legal Opinion

Haddad v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*256Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered August 16, 2002, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to amend their bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their bill of particulars subsequent to the filing of their note of issue and certificate of readiness to allege an additional injury to plaintiff George Haddad was properly denied. Plaintiffs offered no reasonable excuse for their delay in moving to amend, and, indeed, it appears from the record that there could be no reasonable excuse since…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. Riverdale Manor Home for AdultsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Gomez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API