Legal Opinion

Mandel v. Peay

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, Pulaski Chancery Court. Hon. Hulbert F. Fairchild, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice English

John A. Nelson, a merchant of Little Rock, being in failing circumstances, made a deed of trust to L. L. Mandel and O. S. Ingram, as trustees, for the benefit of a large number of his creditors of New York, Philadelphia and New Orleans. The deed conveys to the trustees certain lands, city lots, and slaves, the property of the grantor; and then proceeds as follows: “ and also with the consent of L. L. Manclel, now present, and subscribing the same, all the stock of merchandize in said city of Little Rock, belonging to John A. Nelson Co., or firm composed of John A. Nelson and L. L. Mandel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hempstead v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  2. Cornish v. DewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Emerson v. SenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Blumenstiel v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Wooldridge v. IrvingUnited States Circuit Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API