Legal Opinion

A. B. C. Electrotype Co. v. Ames

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1936No. 23597. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shaw

Plaintiffs (appellees) are engaged in making electrotypes, stereotypes and matrices for the use of their customers, the products being reproductions of type or patterns supplied by the customers. It appears from the record that an electrotype or stereotype is a reproduction cast in metal and mounted on a wooden base. A matrix is a reproduction made on blotting paper which the customer has his printer use by pouring melted type-metal thereon, thus obtaining metal reproductions which can be used on printing presses. Printers, newspapers and advertisers use this means of making further…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. A. Burgess Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crescent Amusement Co. v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ingersoll Milling MacHine Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. W. J. Sandberg Co. v. Iowa State Board of Assessment & ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. Acme Printing Ink Co. v. NudelmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Schawk, Inc. v. ZehnderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API