Legal Opinion

Riverside Ins. Co. v. Parker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 27, 1964No. 5-3113PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

The question presented in this case is whether the appellant effectively canceled the automobile insurance policy issued by it to the appellees. In a declaratory judgment proceeding’ the trial court, sitting as a jury, resolved the issue in favor of the appellees. The judgment recited, in pertinent part:

“That the attempted cancellation of the aforesaid policy by the defendant, Riverside Insurance Co. of America, on or about the 15th day of May, 1961, was not effective for the reason that the defendant did not tender to the plaintiffs the unearned or unused…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Surety Corporation v. DiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Ellzey v. Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. of MinnesotaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Indiana Insurance v. HartwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Kinney v. Rochester German InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  5. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. López Castro v. Atlantic Southern InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2003
  2. Grubbs v. Credit General InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Home Ins. Co. v. Thunderbird, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1976
  4. F & H Catering Service, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  5. Green Mountain Insurance v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API