Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Astrue

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 8, 2008No. Civil Action 07-11324-RCLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff Daniel Hunt (“Hunt”), through his legal guardian Theresa Smith (“Smith”, formerly Theresa Hunt), appeals the denial of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits by the defendant Michael Astrue, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”). Hunt argues that the hearing officer erroneously found that Hunt was not disabled and that a trust set up for Hunt was a countable resource because it is revocable. The Commissioner opposes the appeal, claiming that Hunt’s disability is not relevant to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. KUBETIN v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  2. (PS)(SS) Lucas v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API