Vandenheuvel v. Wagner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Appellants D. Scott and Dawn Vanden-heuvel challenge the district court’s decision allowing respondent Virgil A. Wagner to recover, under Minn. R. Civ. P. 68 (“Rule 68”), his total costs and disbursements incurred from the beginning of the lawsuit. Appellants contend that when the net verdict is less favorable to the offeree than the pretrial offer of judgment, Rule 68 allows the offeror to recover only those costs and disbursements incurred after the offer of judgment was made. A divided panel of the court of appeals affirmed the district court’s award of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Borchert v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- COMMANDEUR LLC v. Howard Hartry, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Rush v. JostockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- General Marketing Services, Inc. v. American Motorsports, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Dave Knutson Siding LLC v. Dustin Fetter, Lisa ThostensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- Ernster v. ScheeleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017