Legal Opinion
United States v. Vincent Demartino, AKA Chickie
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 23, 1997No. 1533, Docket 96-1725PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Vincent DeMartino, convicted of a firearm offense in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Edward R. Korman, Judge, appeals from an order denying his motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 for a correction of the written judgment of conviction, to conform that judgment to the sentence pronounced on him orally by the court at the sentencing hearing. The district court held that Rule 36 was inapplicable because the deviation of the written judgment from the oral pronouncement was not a clerical or technical error, but was an intentional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bartone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Ramon Wilberto Abreu-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Edwin PaganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Melendez-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Dominick Truscello John Gammarano Salvatore Lombardi Barry Nichilo Gaetano Vastola Manny Garafolo Steven Long, Steven CreaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. A-Abras Inc., Osip TaskCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Roberto RosarioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.