State ex rel. Mount v. Smith

The contention out of which this case grows has been before the Supreme Court a number of times, one branch of it before us. This is the second appeal of this case to our court. On the former appeal we reversed and remanded it for error of the trial court in not confining the testimony as to the costs and expenses incurred and’ for which the curator and his sureties were said to be liable *68on bond as curator, to sncli expenses as were incurred in bolding the curator liable as such only as related to his resistance to the claim of the minor to an interest in certain real estate; that is, in not…