Trowbridge, Inc. v. Hathaway
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Because of an apparent conflict of decisions we issued a writ of certiorari to review the decision of .the District Court of Appeal in Trowbridge, Inc. v. Hathaway, 226 So.2d 35 (1st Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1969). After hearing oral argument and consideration of the record and briefs we find that the writ was improvidently issued and should be discharged. However, compare Crane Co. v. Fine, 221 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1969), where the record revealed that despite late service of the statutory forty-five day notice, Fla.Stat. § 84.061(2) (a) (1963), F.S.A., the owner still retained funds due the general…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crane Co. v. FineSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Stancil v. GardnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Trowbridge, Inc. v. HathawayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bishop v. James A. Knowles, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- WW Gay Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. CaseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Trace v. NicosiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972