Thames v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
454 So.2d 1061 (1984)
Oliver THAMES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. AY-188.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 25, 1984.
Rehearing Denied September 5, 1984.
Oliver Thames, pro se.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
ZEHMER, Judge.
Oliver Thames appeals from the trial court's order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion.[1] The order was entered by the trial court without explanation or attachment of supporting portions of the record. Appellant's motion alleged ineffective assistance of counsel because of defense counsel's failure to move for severance…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. VazquezSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Dedmon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Vazquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pope v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Sorgman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Bateson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- McClain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.