Legal Opinion
Navarro v. Rodriguez
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 12, 1984PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
202 N.J. Super. 520 (1984)
495 A.2d 476
PABLO NAVARRO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PAULINA RODRIGUEZ, PAULINA ACEVEDO AND THE CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Essex County.
Decided December 12, 1984.
Anthony L. Coviello for plaintiff (Linares & Seradzky, attorneys).
Jeanne M. Damgen for defendant City of Newark (Rosalind Lubetsky Bressler, Corporation Counsel of City of Newark, attorney).
No appearance by defendants Paulina Rodriguez or Paulina Acevedo.
OPINION
VILLANUEVA, J.S.C.
The issue is whether a plaintiff has substantially complied with the notice provisions of the Tort…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peper v. Princeton University Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Loehr v. Ventura County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Dambro v. Union Cty. Pk. Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Reale v. Tp. of WayneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Flynn v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Feinberg v. STATE, DEPSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Murray v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Wood v. County of BurlingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Guerrero v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Sinclair v. DunaganDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.