United States v. Bolden
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLISON, Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the assignment of error,1 and the Government’s reply thereto, and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.
At trial by special court-martial the appellant pled guilty to one count of failing to go to his appointed place duty, one count of willful disobedience of a chief petty officer, and two counts of wrongful use of marijuana in violation of Articles 86, 91, 112a, respectively, of the Uniform Code of Military…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. HornerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. AurichUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. CherryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. PompeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.