Legal Opinion

Joshua M. Tucker, et al. v. Judge Carolyn J. Paschke, et al.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 30, 2025No. 1:25-cv-01438Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JOSHUA M. TUCKER, et al., ) CASE NO.: 1:25-cv-01438 ) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN ) v. ) ) JUDGE CAROLYN J. PASCHKE, et al., ) OPINION AND ORDER ) Defendants. ) On July 9, 2025, pro se Plaintiffs Joshua Tucker, Timothy Tucker, and Sherlyn Jacobs (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed an incomplete form complaint for civil cases. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiffs did not complete the sections requiring a statement of the legal claims presented, a summary of relevant facts, or the relief sought. (Doc. 1 at 3-4.)1 That same…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API