Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Andersen v. Leahy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1972No. 38433PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This is a mandamus action. The essential question is whether the ordinance annexing the City of Millard to Omaha may be attacked and repealed by a vote of the electors of Omaha on an initiative petition. The district court denied relief and we affirm.

The background history of this litigation is as follows. On December 5, 1967, the city council of Omaha passed ordinance No. 24496, annexing Millard. This ordinance, by its terms, became effective 16 days after passage, or on December 21, 1967. It was attacked by suit in district court, judgment being against Millard. This court affirmed June 5,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Klosterman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Dewey v. Doxey-Layton Realty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Lindsley v. Dallas Consol. St. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Burger v. City of BeatriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Byre v. City of ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Elkhorn v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State Ex Rel. Boyer v. GradyNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Fremont v. KotasNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Byre v. City of ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API