Schlichter v. State

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Arthur Schlichter appeals the consecutive sentences that had been imposed on two counts of Forgery,1 a class C felony, as well as the sentence on one count of Theft,2 a class D felony, following the revocation of his probation. Concluding that the forgery offenses Schli-chter committed arose from a single episode of criminal conduct, we remand to the trial court for a correction of his sentence in accordance with Ind.Code § 85-50-1-2.

FACTS

In August 1996, Schlichter was employed by Alexander Earthwork & Utilities, Inc. (Alexander) in Westville He stole…