Legal Opinion

State v. Byers

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 1989No. Nos. 88-02488 to 88-02492 and 88-02494 to 88-02496PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

2Per curiam

In these eight appeals, which the court has consolidated on its own motion, the state challenges the trial court’s downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. Because the notices of appeal were filed more than fifteen days after the judgments and sentences were rendered, we dismiss the appeals as untimely filed. See State v. Hieber, 541 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); State v. Ealy, 533 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). As in Hieber and Ealy, we acknowl*932edge that our decision is in conflict with State v. Williams, 463 So.2d 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

RYDER, A.C.J., and…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. EalyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. HieberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ByersSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API