Legal Opinion
Denzer v. PUROFIED DOWN PRODUCTS CORP., ETC.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1979No. 79 Civ. 223PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
The plaintiff, James Denzer, brought this action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) to recover pension benefits. The defendants, Purofied Down Corp. (“Purofied”), the Purofied Down Corp. Profit-Sharing and Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) and Bankers Trust Co. (the “Trustee”), move under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The defendants’ motion is supported in part by matters outside the pleadings; thus we must…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- William J. Riley v. Meba Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- The Rochester Corporation v. W. L. Rochester, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Everett Bueneman v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Morrissey v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carr v. First Nationwide BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
- Williams v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Fine v. SemetDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1981
- Morales v. Plaxall, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- First Atlantic Leasing Corp. v. TraceyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.