Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peterson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1989No. 515-87Published

1DissentClinton, Judge

The first precursor to Article 21.22, V.A.C.C.P., was codified in 1858 as O.C. 404; since settled in Texas law is an unerringly upheld prerequisite to validity of an information, viz:

“A variance between the information and the complaint on which it is based as to the date when the offense was committed is fatal to the validity of the information.”

1 Branch’s Annotated Penal Code (2d. Ed. 1956) 456, § 455.*

Of equal antiquity is a corollary rule: “The allegation of the date when the offense was committed is a matter of substance and not of form and cannot be legally amended.” Id., § 457. More…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Catchings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Kennedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Bayless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API