Legal Opinion
White v. Peerless Rubber Mfg. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania
Decided September 26, 1901No. 15PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, District Judge.
Complainant charges infringement of both claims of his patent No. 337,000, dated March 2, 1886, for packing. The claims are as follows:
“(1) As a new article of manufacture, a packing consisting essentially of a tubular, practically nonelastic core capable of being bent or flattened, and a casing or covering of elastic material adapted to constitute a seal, substantially as described. (2) As a now article of manufacture, a packing consisting of a tubular lead core incased in a tube of rubber, substantially as described.”
While the patent concedes the value of lead and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sewall v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Celluloid Manuf'g Co. v. Chrolithion Collar & Cuff Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peerless Rubber Mfg. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902
- Klauder-Weldon Dyeing Mach. Co. v. Steadwell Dyeing Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903