Legal Opinion

White v. Peerless Rubber Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1901No. 15PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

Complainant charges infringement of both claims of his patent No. 337,000, dated March 2, 1886, for packing. The claims are as follows:

“(1) As a new article of manufacture, a packing consisting essentially of a tubular, practically nonelastic core capable of being bent or flattened, and a casing or covering of elastic material adapted to constitute a seal, substantially as described. (2) As a now article of manufacture, a packing consisting of a tubular lead core incased in a tube of rubber, substantially as described.”

While the patent concedes the value of lead and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sewall v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Celluloid Manuf'g Co. v. Chrolithion Collar & Cuff Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peerless Rubber Mfg. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902
  2. Klauder-Weldon Dyeing Mach. Co. v. Steadwell Dyeing Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API