Legal Opinion
Christopher Hargis v. Phil Foster, Beauchamp, Lahaei, D.W. McEcheron and D. H.O. Crawford
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 2002No. 00-35466PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
312 F.3d 404
Christopher HARGIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Phil FOSTER, Beauchamp, Lahaei, D.W. McEcheron, and D. H.O. Crawford, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-35466.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted November 8, 2001.
Filed March 7, 2002.
Amended Opinion Filed December 3, 2002.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Gregory Mann Miller, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Stephanie A. Altig, Boise, ID, for the defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho; Mikel H. Williams, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-98-00510-MHW.
Befor…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steven Madick v. Presidio, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2023