Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1962No. 4 Div. 452PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

Counts one and three of the indictment charged embezzlement. Count two charged false pretense. At the beginning of the trial the court granted the defendant’s motion to require the state to elect as to the counts under which it would proceed. The state elected to go to trial under counts one and three, the embezzlement counts. There was a general verdict of guilty.

Count one charged that appellant being the clerk, agent, servant or apprentice of Ella Ballard, embezzled or fraudulently-converted to his own use, or to the use of another, or fraudulently secreted with intent to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Wall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Fernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Woodard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Headley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Benefield v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Napier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API