Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of tort. The declaration is in two counts: the first for assault, the second for false imprisonment. As the trial judge ruled that there could be no recovery on the first count, the second only is before us. At the close of the evidence, the defendant moved for a directed verdict upon the grounds that there was not sufficient evidence to warrant a finding that the acts complained of were committed by an agent or servant of the defendant, and that such acts did not in law constitute false imprisonment. The motion was denied and the defendant excepted.

There was evidence that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacques v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Collyer v. S. H. Kress & Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sokoloski v. SplannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Coblyn v. Kennedy's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Teel v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Bettolo v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API