Legal Opinion

In re Clair

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 2016No. 15-BG-889Published

1Per curiam

On August 3, 2015, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) found that Jerome E. Clair, respondent, violated District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct 3.3 (a)(1), 3.4 (c), 8.4 (c), and 8.5 (d) in connection with his representation in a personal injury action against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, as well as Rules 1.15 (a), 1.15 (c), 3.4 (c), 8.4 (b), and 8.4 (c) in connection with his representation in an estate matter. The Board adopted all but one of the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, to which neither Mr. Clair…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re WemhoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. In re Daryl J. Hudson, IIIDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. In re Lorenzo C. Fitzgerald, Jr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API