Weil v. Marquis
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 318, Jan. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1916, No. 1720, discharging rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Nita M. Weil, Administratrix of the Estate of Abraham Marquis, Deceased, v. Jeanette A. Marquis. Assumpsit for money had and received. Rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense. Tbe court discharged the rule for judgment. Plaintiff appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 318, Jan. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1916, No. 1720, discharging rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Nita M. Weil, Administratrix of the Estate of Abraham Marquis, Deceased, v. Jeanette A. Marquis. Assumpsit for money had and received. Rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense. Tbe court discharged the rule for judgment. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was in refusing to make absolute the rule for judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This appeal is dismissed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below discharging the rules for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
2Cited by25 opinions
- Kenin's Trust Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Riley v. WirthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Henderson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Bayer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Kyle v. McGuirkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.