State v. Gibson
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBistline, Justice
I
Constitutionality of the Sentencing Under the Idaho Constitution
Not in Creech,1 not in Sivak,2 and again not in Gibson, has the State presented any argument and authority to refute the considered and substantiated views of Justice Huntley and myself that a defendant convicted of first degree murder in Idaho is possessed of a right guaranteed by the Idaho Constitution to have a jury determine whether he shall live or die. While it is true that Justice Bakes attempted a refutation in his Sivak opinion, it did not meet the documented history which establishes that at the time of the adoption of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. OsbornIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SivakIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.