Legal Opinion

SELECTIVE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. TARGET CORPORATION

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 16, 2019No. 1:19-cv-13720Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE SELECTIVE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, as subrogee of Roy Wolochow, Civil No. 19-13720 (RMB/JS) Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER TARGET CORP. and THE HOME DEPOT, et al., Defendants. THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Court’s Order to Show Cause why the Motion to Intervene should not be remanded [Docket No. 6] and Removing Defendant Target Corp.’s response thereto [Docket No. 7]. Having considered Target’s response, the Court holds that Target has not established that removal is proper,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Davenport v. Hamilton, Brown, & Babst, L.L.C.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API