Legal Opinion

Paul Bartsch v. Chamberlin Company of America, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 11, 1959No. 13742PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant filed an action in the District Court against the appellee for breach of contract. Appellee moved to dismiss the action for the reason that the complaint’failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. By order of July 3, 1957, the District Judge granted appellee’s. motion and. ordered “that'the complaint herein is hereby dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.” No appeal was taken.

On September 30, 1957, appellant filed the present action m- zhe District Court against the appellee upon the same alleged cause of action. Appellee filed a motion for summary judgment in which it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Van Brode Milling Co. v. Kellogg Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953
  3. Bartfield v. ParkhurstDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1953

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Eugene A. CEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Rampy v. ICI Acrylics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,044 Sandra Lee Simmons Shaw v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  4. Rambur v. Diehl Lumber CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. DASA Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API