Legal Opinion

McAleer v. Walter & Bell

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1901Published

Action for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

The defendants manufacture bags. The plaintiff was employed as operator on a sewing machine. She was about seventeen years old and had been in the employ of the defendants some time, but had operated the machine only two or *475three months. The machine was of standard make and the best in the market for that character of work. It was out of repair, several weeks before, in such way that it would not sew properly, and had been brought back from the repair shop the day before the accident. It did not sew properly, however, the thread breaking continually, and' the foreman was called and examined…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harley v. Buffalo Car Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Strauss v. Haberman Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Kelly v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & Saint Nicholas Avenue RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API