Camera v. DiNapoli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
*1020We confirm. “As an applicant for accidental and performance of duty disability retirement benefits, petitioner bore the burden of proving that he is permanently incapacitated from performing his job duties” (Matter of Girsh v DiNapoli, 79 AD3d 1444, 1444 [2010] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Wilkinson v DiNapoli, 86 AD3d 851, 852 [2011]). To that end, petitioner submitted the medical reports of various treating physicians, in which they opined that petitioner was either partially or totally disabled at the time of their examination. None of these…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Girsh v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Salik v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hall v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Wilkinson v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Fochi v. New York State ComptrollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cantelmo v. New York State ComptrollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Pavone v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Pennachio v. DinapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of London v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Cantelmo v. New York State ComptrollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.